Assessing the impact of management on sea anglers in the UK using choice experiments

Andrews, Barnaby, Ferrini, Silvia, Muench, Angela, Brown, Adam and Hyder, Kieran (2021) Assessing the impact of management on sea anglers in the UK using choice experiments. Journal of Environmental Management, 293. ISSN 0301-4797

[img] PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 June 2022.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (353kB) | Request a copy
[img] XML Word Processing Document (DOCX) (Supplementary materials_Final)
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 June 2022.

Download (38kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Recreational sea angling is a popular activity generating significant socio-economic benefits but can impact on fish stocks. The motivations of recreational sea anglers go beyond catch, with a diverse range of motivations relating to physical health and well-being. Heterogenous motives and the popularity of catch and release practices mean that applying commercial fisheries management goals (maximum sustainable yield) to recreational fisheries could result in reduced participation, increased non-compliance, and a subsequent loss of both market and non-market values generated through recreational angling activities. Hence, assessment of sea angler preferences for management is important for the development of appropriate management strategies. In this study, a choice experiment was conducted to assess sea anglers' preferences for changes in UK sea angling management measures. Stated preferences for catching, keeping, and releasing fish due to bag limits and minimum-landing sizes were assessed. Willingness to pay (WTP) estimates for marginal changes of catching the first sea bass on a trip were between £11 and £31 depending on whether the fish could be kept or released and between £11 and £28 for cod, respectively. WTP was much higher for fish caught and kept than caught and released suggesting that consumption of fish was an important motivation. Minimum size was the most considered choice attribute for respondents, while cost was less commonly considered. The implications of the findings are discussed in the context of future management of recreational fisheries.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences
Faculty of Science
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 18 Jun 2021 00:08
Last Modified: 29 Jul 2021 00:10
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/80288
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112831

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item