Bertsch, Christoph, Calcagno, Claudio and Le Quement, Mark (2015) Systematic bailout guarantees and tacit coordination. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 15 (1). ISSN 1935-1682
Preview |
PDF (Published manuscript)
- Published Version
Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Both the academic literature and the policy debate on systematic bailout guarantees and Government subsidies have ignored an important effect: in industries where firms may go out of business due to idiosyncratic shocks, Governments may increase the likelihood of (tacit) coordination if they set up schemes that rescue failing firms. In a repeated-game setting, we show that a systematic bailout regime increases the expected profits from coordination and simultaneously raises the probability that competitors will remain in business and will thus be able to “punish” firms that deviate from coordinated behaviour. These effects make tacit coordination easier to sustain and have a detrimental impact on welfare. While the key insight holds across any industry, we study this question with an application to the banking sector, in light of the recent financial crisis and the extensive use of bailout schemes.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition policy,systematic bailout guarantees,collusion,banking,state aid |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Industrial Economics Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 12 Apr 2017 05:10 |
Last Modified: | 31 Jan 2024 02:15 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63227 |
DOI: | 10.1515/bejeap-2014-0027 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |