Private acts, social acts and entrepreneurship: Can Millian liberalism justify regulation against bad nudges?

Sugden, Robert (2025) Private acts, social acts and entrepreneurship: Can Millian liberalism justify regulation against bad nudges? Constitutional Political Economy. ISSN 1043-4062 (In Press)

PDF (private acts, social acts final) - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099. Request a copy

Abstract

Retail firms routinely use non-deceptive ‘nudges’ (i.e., psychological cues) to induce consumers to buy their products. Le Grand and New (Government Paternalism, 2015) and Oliver (A Political Economy of Behavioural Public Policy, 2023) argue in favour of regulations (‘budges’ in Oliver’s terminology) that prohibit such nudges when regulators judge the relevant product to be harmful to consumers. These writers claim that such regulations are compatible with John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle. I examine this claim through a close study of Mill’s relevant writings. I show that, when Mill explicitly considers issues analogous with present-day discussions of nudging, his position is broadly similar to those taken by Le Grand and New and Oliver. However, he is able to take that position because his mental model of a competitive market is that of early and mid-nineteenth century political economy. That model does not represent the entrepreneurial mechanisms by which competitive markets can support and promote what for Mill is a fundamental human value—the value of individuality. If the role of entrepreneurship is recognised, Le Grand and New’s and Oliver’s justifications for regulations against non-deceptive but supposedly harmful nudges are contrary to the spirit of the Harm Principle.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	john stuart mill,private acts,social acts,entrepreneurship,nudges,budges,economics, econometrics and finance(all),2*,a contribution to a symposium in a relatively minor journal. but it's an original contribution to a significant literature on behavioural public policy, and to the history of economic thought. ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2000
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	15 Jul 2025 10:33
Last Modified:	15 Jul 2025 10:33
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99925
DOI:	issn:1043-4062

Actions (login required)

View Item