From local solutions to catchment-wide management: An investigation of upstream-downstream trade-offs when scaling out nature-based flood risk management

King, Phoebe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-3649 and Bark, Rosalind H. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9876-9322 (2024) From local solutions to catchment-wide management: An investigation of upstream-downstream trade-offs when scaling out nature-based flood risk management. Ecosystems and People, 20 (1). ISSN 2639-5908

Preview

PDF (King_Bark_2024_EcosystemsAndPeople) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

Natural flood management (NFM) is a nature-based solution (NbS) widely recognised as an option to regulate flooding whilst providing multiple ecosystem services (ES) for society and the environment. To address climate change-enhanced flood risk, localised-NFM could be scaled out (expanded geographically to the catchment level). Implementing catchment-scale NFM will not only change landscape appearance but also give rise to potential ES trade-offs between the ‘providers’ of upstream land for flood regulation and the ‘beneficiaries’ of reduced flooding downstream. This paper presents a live case study of four river catchments in the UK, where a multi-agency-funded collaborative project is implementing integrated, catchment-scale NFM to work with downstream urban flood defences. Assessment of the views of upstream-downstream catchment communities is limited. Utilising five focus groups (n = 17 participants) we investigate the potential misalignments or synergies between catchment communities that will provision or benefit from NFM that could either derail or support scaling out initiatives. Results reveal that upstream and downstream participants hold strong affinities to contemporary rural landscape aesthetics, expressing sympathies with tasking farmers with delivering flood regulation ES when their traditional vocation is to deliver provisioning ES. Participants also exhibited resistance to landscape change caused by NFM. Nevertheless, acceptability of scaling out NFM increased when aesthetic preferences were considered, especially in provider regions, while beneficiaries prioritised more effective NFM measures over appearance. Inclusive discussion and knowledge exchange (e.g. personal stories, catchment visualisations) in the focus groups facilitated greater appreciation of whole catchment community values and understanding for scaling out NFM.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Data availability statement: The data that supports the concepts, methods and findings of this study can be found in the supplementary materials.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	sdg 13 - climate action,sdg 15 - life on land ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/climate_action
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Environmental Social Sciences
Related URLs:	https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	28 Nov 2024 01:37
Last Modified:	02 Dec 2024 01:45
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/97802
DOI:	10.1080/26395916.2024.2426716

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item