Tools
Tools
Wallis, Emily J. 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2475-0899, Osborn, Timothy J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8425-6799, Taylor, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3473-3478, Jones, Philip D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5032-5493, Joshi, Manoj ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2948-2811 and Hawkins, Ed
(2024)
Quantifying exposure biases in early instrumental land surface air temperature observations.
International Journal of Climatology, 44 (5).
pp. 1611-1635.
ISSN 0899-8418
Preview |
PDF (Wallis_etal_2024_IJC)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (7MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Exposure biases are a pervasive non-climatic change in land air temperature records which have been introduced as a result of changes in the way thermometers were sheltered from solar radiation and the elements over time. Exposure biases have not been widely accounted for in observational records, due to difficulties detecting/correcting the bias using traditional homogenisation techniques; therefore, exposure biases still contribute significant uncertainty to the early period in global temperature compilations. Here, an empirical approach to address the bias arising from the introduction of Stevenson-type screens from the late-19th century is presented. The approach consists of: (1) an empirical analysis of 54 parallel measurement series to identify the characteristics of the exposure bias in four exposure classes; (2) the development of bias-estimation models based on an analysis of which variables influence the bias; and (3) the application of the models to an extended version of CRUTEM5 (CRUTEM5_ext), based on exposure metadata, to quantify and reduce the bias. Step one identified differences between the temperatures recorded in Stevenson screens and early exposures, which vary seasonally, diurnally, and with location and exposure class. The largest biases (in mean temperatures) were found in freestanding exposures (up to −0.78°C annually) and in summer, while the smallest biases were generally found in wall-mounted exposures (near-0°C annually) and in winter. Significant relationships between the bias and temperature, downward top of atmosphere and/or received shortwave downward solar radiation were found in each exposure class and led to the development of three regression-based bias-estimation models. Application of these models to 1,960 mid-latitude stations in CRUTEM5_ext, resulted in small (≤0.016°C) positive adjustments to the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitude mean before 1880, and larger (≤−0.1°C) negative adjustments to the Northern and Southern Hemisphere mid-latitude means between 1882–1934 and 1856–1900, respectively. Larger adjustments were estimated regionally: up to −0.57°C annually and −0.79°C seasonally in individual grid cells.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Research Funding: UK Natural Environment Research Council. Grant Number: NE/S015582/1 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | stevenson screen,exposure bias,land air temperature,observations,parallel measurements,atmospheric science ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1900/1902 |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Climatic Research Unit |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Mar 2024 13:30 |
| Last Modified: | 25 Sep 2024 17:42 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/94652 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/joc.8401 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |