Chowdhury, Subhasish M., Mukherjee, Anwesha and Turocy, Theodore L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-844X (2022) And the first runner-up is...: Comparing winner selection procedures in multi-winner Tullock contests. Review of Economic Design. ISSN 1434-4750
Preview |
PDF (Chowdhury_etal_2022_RoED)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We characterise the strategic equivalence among k-winner contests using simultaneous and sequential winner selection. We test this prediction of strategic equivalence using a series of laboratory experiments, contrasting 1-winner contests with 2-winner contests, varying in the latter whether the outcome is revealed sequentially or in a single stage. We find that in the long run, average bidding levels are similar across strategically-equivalent contests. However, adaptation in 2-winner contests is slower and less systematic, which is consistent with the property that simultaneous winner selection results in outcomes that are more random than in the 1-winner case.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Funding: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2022 12:30 |
Last Modified: | 22 Apr 2023 02:27 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/89206 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10058-022-00315-5 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |