Soft power, hard news: How journalists at state-funded transnational media legitimize their work

Wright, Kate, Scott, Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6744-443X and Bunce, Mel (2020) Soft power, hard news: How journalists at state-funded transnational media legitimize their work. International Journal of Press/Politics, 25 (4). pp. 607-631. ISSN 1940-1612

[thumbnail of Accepted_Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (331kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Published_Version]
Preview
PDF (Published_Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (294kB) | Preview

Abstract

How do journalists working for different state-funded international news organizations legitimize their relationship to the governments which support them? In what circumstances might such journalists resist the diplomatic strategies of their funding states? We address these questions through a comparative study of journalists working for international news organizations funded by the Chinese, US, UK and Qatari governments. Using 52 interviews with journalists covering humanitarian issues, we explain how they minimized tensions between their diplomatic role and dominant norms of journalistic autonomy by drawing on three – broadly shared – legitimizing narratives, involving different kinds of boundary-work. In, the first ‘exclusionary’ narrative, journalists differentiated their ‘truthful’ news reporting from the ‘false’ state ‘propaganda’ of a common Other, the Russian-funded network, RT. In the second ‘fuzzifying’ narrative, journalists deployed the ambiguous notion of ‘soft power’ as an ambivalent ‘boundary concept’, to defuse conflicts between journalistic and diplomatic agendas. In the final ‘inversion’ narrative, journalists argued that, paradoxically, their dependence on funding states gave them greater ‘operational autonomy’. Even when journalists did resist their funding states, this was hidden or partial, and prompted less by journalists’ concerns about the political effects of their work, than by serious threats to their personal cultural capital.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: censorship,comparative research,global news agencies,journalism,satellite television,state-media relations,communication,sociology and political science,4* ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3315
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development)
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > The State, Governance and Conflict
Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Cultural Politics, Communications & Media
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 16 Apr 2020 00:46
Last Modified: 18 Jan 2023 09:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/74765
DOI: 10.1177/1940161220922832

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item