Boyden, Michael and Kelbert, Eugenia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6585-7588 (2018) Introduction: The theory deficit in translingual studies. Journal of World Literature, 3 (2). pp. 127-135. ISSN 2405-6480
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
From the Goncourt to the Nobel, from Booker to Pulitzer, an astonishing proportion of winners of national literary awards today are people writing in an acquired language whose work does not fit neatly into the nation-state paradigm. Many others allow their language of writing to be cross-fertilized by idioms, dialects, and literary traditions that most would consider alien to it. Yet, until recently, only a handful of scholars, such as Forster (1970), Steiner (1975), Klosty Beaujour (1989), Seyhan (2000), Kellman (2000) and Oustinoff (2001), identified this linguistic mingling as a distinct literary phenomenon.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Literature, Drama and Creative Writing |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > British Centre for Literary Translation Research Group |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 04 Nov 2019 15:30 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2024 01:36 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/72865 |
DOI: | 10.1163/24056480-00302001 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |