Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations

Batrancea, Larissa, Nichita, Anca, Olsen, Jerome, Kogler, Christoph, Kirchler, Erich, Hoelzl, Erik, Weiss, Avi, Torgler, Benno, Fooken, Jonas, Fuller, Joanne, Schaffner, Markus, Banuri, Sheheryar ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-0299, Hassanein, Medhat, Alarcón-García, Gloria, Aldemir, Ceyhan, Apostol, Oana, Bank Weinberg, Diana, Batrancea, Ioan, Belianin, Alexis, De Jesús Bello Gómez, Felipe, Briguglio, Marie, Dermol, Valerij, Doyle, Elaine, Gcabo, Rebone, Gong, Binglin, Ennya, Sara, Essel-Anderson, Anthony, Frecknall-Hughes, Jane, Hasanain, Ali, Hizen, Yoichi, Huber, Odilo, Kaplanoglou, Georgia, Kudła, Janusz, Lemoine, Jérémy E., Leurcharusmee, Supanika, Matthiasson, Thorolfur, Mehta, Sanjeev, Min, Sejin, Naufal, George, Niskanen, Mervi, Nordblom, Katarina, Bağış Öztürk, Engin, Pacheco, Luis, Pántya, József, Rapanos, Vassilis, Roland-Lévy, Christine, Maria Roux-Cesar, Ana, Salamzadeh, Aidin, Savadori, Lucia, Schei, Vidar, Sharma, Manoj, Summers, Barbara, Suriya, Komsan, Tran, Quoc, Villegas-Palacio, Clara, Visser, Martine, Xia, Chun, Yi, Sunghwan and Zukauskas, Sarunas (2019) Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74. ISSN 0167-4870

Preview

PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

The slippery slope framework of tax compliance emphasizes the importance of trust in authorities as a substantial determinant of tax compliance alongside traditional enforcement tools like audits and fines. Using data from an experimental scenario study in 44 nations from five continents (N = 14,509), we find that trust in authorities and power of authorities, as defined in the slippery slope framework, increase tax compliance intentions and mitigate intended tax evasion across societies that differ in economic, sociodemographic, political, and cultural backgrounds. We also show that trust and power foster compliance through different channels: trusted authorities (those perceived as benevolent and enhancing the common good) register the highest voluntary compliance, while powerful authorities (those perceived as effectively controlling evasion) register the highest enforced compliance. In contrast to some previous studies, the results suggest that trust and power are not fully complementary, as indicated by a negative interaction effect. Despite some between-country variations, trust and power are identified as important determinants of tax compliance across all nations. These findings have clear implications for authorities across the globe that need to choose best practices for tax collection.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Environment, Resources and Conflict Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural and Experimental Development Economics
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	17 Jul 2019 08:30
Last Modified:	19 Dec 2024 00:57
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/71761
DOI:	10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item