Brandts, Jordi, Cooper, David J. and Weber, Roberto A. (2014) Legitimacy, communication, and leadership in the turnaround game. Management Science, 61 (11). pp. 2627-2645. ISSN 0025-1909
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
We study the effectiveness of leaders for inducing coordinated organizational change to a more efficient equilibrium, i.e., a turnaround. We compare communication from leaders to incentive increases and also compare the effectiveness of randomly selected and elected leaders. Although all interventions yield shifts to more efficient equilibria, communication from leaders has a greater effect than incentives. Moreover, leaders who are elected by followers are significantly better at improving their group’s outcome than randomly selected leaders. The improved effectiveness of elected leaders results from sending more performance-relevant messages. Our results are evidence that the way in which leaders are selected affects their legitimacy and the degree to which they influence followers. Finally, we observe that a combination of factors—specifically, incentive increases and communication from elected leaders—yields near-universal turnarounds to full efficiency.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | leadership,job selection,coordination failure,experiments,communication |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2018 14:30 |
Last Modified: | 03 Aug 2023 13:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/66778 |
DOI: | 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2021 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |