Crès, Hervé and Tvede, Mich (2018) Regulation of trades based on differences in beliefs. European Economic Review, 101. pp. 133-141. ISSN 0014-2921
Preview |
PDF (Accepted manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (166kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Some trades based on differences in beliefs might cause more harm than good. Should they be restricted? If yes, how? We propose three properties ensuring that regulation does not prevent beneficial trade and is consistent: Unanimity – the regulator should not object to trades with identical beliefs; Merge-Proofness of Autarky – if the regulator does not object to finitely many unrelated trades, all with identical beliefs, then it should not object to the mere juxtaposition of the trades; and Independence of Irrelevant Trade – if the regulator does not object to the juxtaposition of two unrelated trades, then it should not object to any of the two trades standing alone. We show that there is a unique policy having these three properties, namely laissez-faire.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | heterogeneous beliefs,pareto efficiency,regulation,speculative trading |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 05 Oct 2017 05:08 |
Last Modified: | 24 Aug 2023 00:24 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/65046 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.001 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |