Faillo, Marco, Smerilli, Alessandra and Sugden, Robert (2017) Bounded best-response and collective-optimality reasoning in coordination games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 140. 317–335. ISSN 0167-2681
Preview |
PDF (Accepted manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We investigate experimentally the conditions under which bounded best-response and collective-optimality reasoning are used in coordination games. Using level-k and team reasoning theories as exemplars, we study games with three pure-strategy equilibria, two of which are mutually isomorphic. The third is always team-optimal, but whether it is predicted by level-k theory differs across games. We find that collective-optimality reasoning is facilitated if the collectively optimal equilibrium gives more equal payoffs than the others, and is inhibited if that equilibrium is Pareto-dominated by the others, considered separately. We suggest that coordination cannot be explained by a single theory.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | team reasoning,level-k theory,coordination games |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 23 May 2017 05:05 |
Last Modified: | 19 Apr 2023 21:32 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63587 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.05.015 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |