Fisher, Brendan and Turner, R. Kerry (2008) Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141 (5). pp. 1167-1169.
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
This letter is in response to an article by Ken Wallace titled “Classifications of ecosystem services: problems and solutions” (Biological Conservation 139, 2007). This letter discusses the points we see as problematic with Wallace’s framework and sets out our conceptualization of linking ecosystem services with human welfare. In this letter we suggest that utilizing the terms intermediate services, final services and benefits should go a long way to clearing up much of the ambiguity in ecosystem services typologies, especially for economic valuation purposes. As Wallace points out, clearly defining and organizing the concept of ecosystem services is not just a semantic decision, but it is integral to operationalizing something that can clearly illuminate tradeoffs in natural resource management.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Collaborative Centre for Sustainable Use of the Seas Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Environmental Social Sciences Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Resources, Sustainability and Governance (former - to 2018) |
Depositing User: | Rosie Cullington |
Date Deposited: | 01 Mar 2011 13:29 |
Last Modified: | 12 Jan 2023 17:31 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/25409 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.019 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |