Sugden, Robert (2009) Market simulation and the provision of public goods: a non-paternalistic response to anomalies in environmental evaluation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57 (1). pp. 87-103.
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Most normative economics assumes that individuals have coherent preferences. This paper responds to growing evidence of failures of this assumption, particularly in the context of stated-preference methods widely used in environmental policy analysis. It proposes a non-paternalistic concept of consumer sovereignty that does not assume preference coherence, is satisfied by competitive markets, and can be applied to the provision of public goods. A key implication is that decisions should reflect valuations revealed ‘at the point of consumption’. Such valuations, which can be inferred from hedonic prices, may be less susceptible to willingness-to-accept (WTA)/willingness-to-pay (WTP) disparities than those elicited by stated-preference methods.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | market simulation,public goods,paternalism,environmental evaluation |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics |
Depositing User: | Gina Neff |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jan 2011 11:09 |
Last Modified: | 22 Apr 2023 00:52 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/18414 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.09.001 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |