An International Consensus Statement on the methodological standards for physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development

Milton, Karen, Pearsons, Alice, Hanson, Coral L., Chou, Roger and Stamatakis, Emmanuel (2025) An International Consensus Statement on the methodological standards for physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines development. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 22 (12). 1519–1526. ISSN 1543-3080

Preview	PDF (Delphi paper - R2 - Clean - PURE) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (385kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Delphi paper - R2 - Clean - PURE) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (385kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization and many national health bodies have released physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines; however, there are inconsistencies across jurisdictions, which may partly be due to variation in guideline development processes. This study aimed to develop international consensus on the methodological standards for the development of future physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi study. Experts in physical activity and/or guideline development rated a series of statements on stakeholder involvement, the types of evidence and study designs considered, and the utilization of formal approaches in guideline development. Consensus was defined as group agreement of ≥80%. Results: Twenty-three participants from 8 countries reached consensus that (1) different stages of the guidelines development process require the involvement of different stakeholders; (2) previous study-level synthesized evidence must be included in evidence reviews, and individual studies can be included if published after the most recent review or where review evidence is unavailable; (3) parallel randomized controlled studies must be included in review processes (83.3% agreement), with observational cohort studies marginally missing the agreement criterion (79.2% agreement), while predictive modeling, crossover trials, nonrandomized trials and case control studies can be included; and (4) formal approaches must be utilized to assess the quality of individual primary studies, the reporting and quality of systematic reviews, and the overall process for grading evidence. Conclusions: The findings provide a set of methodological standards to improve consistency and rigor in the development of future physical activity and sedentary behavior guidelines.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Funding Source: E.S. is funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant level 2 (APP1194510).
Uncontrolled Keywords:	delphi,methods,public health,recommendations,public health, environmental and occupational health,physical therapy, sports therapy and rehabilitation,epidemiology,orthopedics and sports medicine ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2739
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Public Health
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?...
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	01 Jul 2025 09:32
Last Modified:	09 Dec 2025 10:30
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99790
DOI:	10.1123/jpah.2025-0175

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item