Prospective registration was associated with a reduced risk of bias for randomized controlled trials: A meta-research study

Tian, Yuan, Lu, Haofei, Zhou, Wenxuan, Suhail, Doi A. R., Furuya-Kanamori, Luis, Lin, Lifeng, Loke, Yoon, Vohra, Sunita, Xu, Chang and Xu, Zheqi (2025) Prospective registration was associated with a reduced risk of bias for randomized controlled trials: A meta-research study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 184. ISSN 0895-4356

PDF (Final Submitted Version Apr 2025) - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2026. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Request a copy

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the association between trial registration and the risk of bias (RoB). Study Design and Settings: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from systematic reviews of medication-related harm published between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020, were used, assessing first post and start dates on open registries along with RoB. Multivariable logistic regression analyses for both individual safeguards and overall RoB by registration status (ie, nonregistered, retrospectively registered, and prospectively registered) were conducted. Results: A total of 2030 RCTs were identified from 151 systematic reviews; 65.46% (851/1300) were registered prospectively and 34.54% (449/1300) retrospectively among 64.04% (1300/2030) registered RCTs. Regression analysis indicated that when compared to nonregistered trials, prospective registration was associated with safeguards against bias using randomization sequence generation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.09, 2.07), allocation concealment (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.36), blinding of outcome assessors (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.38), as well as lower overall RoB (OR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.19, 3.50). When comparing prospectively and retrospectively registered trials, prospective registration was more likely to have lower overall and individual RoB, but this was not statistically significant. Prospective registration was associated with blinding of participants (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.30) and health-care providers (OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.28), but not lower overall RoB as compared to retrospective registration. Conclusion: Prospectively registered trials were more likely than nonregistered trials to implement adequate procedures against bias. Prospectively registered trials may also serve as an indicator of lower overall RoB in RCTs.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Data availability statement: We have shared the data via OSF, where the data can be found at https://osf.io/g3mdu/.
Uncontrolled Keywords:	adverse events,harms,prospective registration,randomized controlled trial,retrospective registration,risk of bias,epidemiology ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2713
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?...
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	24 Jun 2025 13:30
Last Modified:	24 Jun 2025 13:30
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99698
DOI:	10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111813

Actions (login required)

View Item