Mee, H., Korhonen, T. K., Castaño-Leon, A. M., Adeleye, A., Allanson, J., Anwar, F., Bhagavatula, I. D., Bond, K., Clement, C., Rubiano, A. M., Grieve, K., Hawrluk, G., Helmy, A., Honeybul, S., Iccarino, C., Lagares, A., Marcus, H., Marklund, N., Muehlschlegel, S., Owen, N., Paul, M., Pomeroy, V., Shukla, D., Servadei, F., Viaroli, E., Warburton, E., Wells, A., Timofeev, I., Turner, C., Whiting, G., Hutchinson, P. and Kolias, A. (2025) A core outcome set for cranioplasty following stroke or traumatic brain injury - the COAST study. Brain & Spine, 5. ISSN 2772-5294
Preview |
PDF (Mee-et-al-2025-BrainAndSpine)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: There is substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of outcomes in the global cranioplasty literature. This study aimed to establish a core outcome set (COS) for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for stroke or traumatic brain injury. Methodology: The scope was defined according to the criteria recommended by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative. Phase 1 focused on outcome gathering through a systematic review and a qualitative study. Phase 2 focused on consolidation and consensus of outcomes through a two-round Delphi survey and consensus meeting. Participants from the four stakeholder groups (1. patients and/or relatives; 2. surgeons, 3. physicians (non-surgeons), 4. Nurses, allied health professionals, and researchers) individually scored all outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale. Variables that did not reach the predefined consensus threshold for COS inclusion or exclusion were voted upon at the final consensus meeting. Results: In total, 208 verbatim outcomes were consolidated into 56 domains. A total of 153 participants completed round 1, with 45 additional outcomes suggested for inclusion. Following rationalisation, four were included in round 2. A total of 109/153 participants (71%) from 16 countries completed Round 2 and re-scored all 60 outcomes (56 original + 4 additional). Nine outcomes were voted in, and 12 were excluded from the Delphi. The remaining 39 were discussed at a consensus meeting with 11 voted in. The final COS included 20 outcomes (12+8) across four domains: life impact, pathophysiological manifestations, resource use/economic impact, and mortality. Conclusion: COAST COS covers key cranioplasty outcomes, as assessed by international stakeholders, including surgical, medical, rehabilitation, and nursing professionals, as well as patients and their relatives. Future implementation will aid in the standardisation of outcomes and facilitate the development of cranioplasty-specific outcome measures, aiding between-study comparisons and improving the relevance of trial findings to healthcare professionals and patients.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Data availability: The data produced in this manuscript are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. Funding: This project has been funded by the Division of Academic Neurosurgery, University of Cambridge. |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Rehabilitation Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jun 2025 13:30 |
Last Modified: | 16 Jun 2025 13:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99564 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104288 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |