Tools
ToolsDudley, Harriet, Holmes, James, Jordan, Andrew and Lorenzoni, Irene (2025) The policy impact of climate change advisory bodies: Government responses to the UK Climate Change Committee’s recommendations, 2009–2020. Climate Policy. ISSN 1469-3062
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Climate advisory bodies have been established in over 40 countries. However, the existing literature focuses on their formation and remits, not their unfolding policy impact. This article addresses this important gap by reporting the findings of a novel analysis of the UK Government’s responses to the UK Climate Change Committee’s (CCC) mitigation and adaptation recommendations published in its annual progress reports, taking written acceptance as a proxy for policy impact. The fact that the CCC is the oldest such body in the world makes it an obvious case to develop and test empirically a new method for undertaking assessments of policy impact. A systematic content analysis of government responses to 592 of the CCC’s 700 recommendations (2009–2020) finds that 23% were accepted, of which only 2% were accepted in full. However, it also reveals that the characteristics of individual recommendations have a notable association with the type of government response (i.e. accepted, rejected, or non-committal). For mitigation recommendations, those with a cross-sectoral focus were over four-times more likely to be accepted than those addressing a specific sector. For those addressing adaptation, the only predictor of acceptance was the degree of repetition; repeated recommendations were nearly five-times more likely to be accepted than fresh ones. For the first time, these findings demonstrate the extent of the association between the form and content of recommendations and how they are subsequently received by government. Moreover, they suggest that climate advisory bodies may be able to achieve greater impact by repeating recommendations over time, and ensuring they contain a clear addressee and a specific action point. Further research should, however, also explore other factors that influence government responses as well as assess how far accepted recommendations are implemented.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Supplemental Material: Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2025.2497881. Funding information: This work was supported by Economic and Social Research Council [grant numbers: ES/P00072X/1; 882601]. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | climate policy,adaptation,advice,advisory body,government,mitigation,environmental science (miscellaneous),management, monitoring, policy and law,global and planetary change,atmospheric science,sdg 13 - climate action ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2300/2301 |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA |
| UEA Research Groups: | University of East Anglia Schools > Faculty of Science > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Marine Knowledge Exchange Network Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Collaborative Centre for Sustainable Use of the Seas Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Environmental Social Sciences Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Science, Society and Sustainability |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Apr 2025 15:33 |
| Last Modified: | 12 May 2025 12:30 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/99148 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/14693062.2025.2497881 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |