Palliative care clinicians' knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)

Barry, Caroline ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-3562, Spathis, Anna, Treaddell, Sarah, Carding, Sally and Barclay, Stephen (2020) Palliative care clinicians' knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care, 10 (2). ISSN 2045-435X

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Objectives To examine palliative care clinicians' level of knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Methods Regional postal survey of palliative care clinicians working in hospices in the East of England, undertaken in April 2015. Clinicians' level of knowledge was assessed by their response to 7 factual questions. Data regarding self-reported levels of confidence in applying the Safeguards was collected, alongside information regarding the number of times they had used DoLS in practice. A free-text section invited additional comments from participants. Results There were 47 responses from 14 different organisations; a response rate of 68%. Respondents included consultants, specialty and associate specialists, registrars, nurses and social workers. Higher self-reported confidence and training in the use of DoLS was associated with higher factual knowledge. Consultants had the highest level of knowledge, training and experience. Doctors of other grades, nurses and social workers recorded less knowledge and experience and scored lower in the knowledge sections. The free-text comments revealed difficulty applying the Safeguards in practice, particularly among the consultant responses, based around several themes: insufficient guidance on how to use the Safeguards, process after death, uncertainty as to relevance to palliative care and delays in assessments. Conclusions Clinicians working in palliative care have good levels of knowledge of the DoLS. Despite this concerns were raised, particularly by consultants; uncertainty as to when they should be used and the relevance of the Safeguards in clinical practice. Further guidance should be given to clinicians working in this specialty to ensure that clinical practice is both lawful and in the patients' best interests.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: clinical decisions,education and training,ethics,hospice care,medicine (miscellaneous),oncology(nursing),medical–surgical ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2701
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2024 01:53
Last Modified: 16 Dec 2024 01:43
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/97972
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001186

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item