Time for Parliament to act? The PACCAR decision of the UK Supreme Court

Peyer, Sebastian (2024) Time for Parliament to act? The PACCAR decision of the UK Supreme Court. Legal Studies, 44 (3). pp. 566-571. ISSN 0261-3875

[thumbnail of Peyer_2024_LegalStudies]
Preview
PDF (Peyer_2024_LegalStudies) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (100kB) | Preview

Abstract

Litigation funding has become an essential ingredient in collective actions for breaches of competition law brought in the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT). In the recent PACCAR proceedings, the Supreme Court was asked to rule on the nature and enforceability of litigation funding agreements (LFAs) between third-party litigation funders and group representatives where the success fee is determined as a percentage of the damages award. The Court held with a 4:1 majority (Lady Rose dissenting) that the LFAs in question are damages-based fee agreements (DBAs) and, as such, unenforceable. This judgment has wide-ranging consequences, as the CAT is unlikely to allow collective actions to proceed if the funding agreements cannot be relied on. The decision has caused uncertainty and upheaval in the funding market as a considerable number of funding agreements in collective proceedings contain DBAs. It also triggered legal challenges in collective proceedings where funders are seeking to amend the funding agreements to deal with the Supreme Court ruling. The fall-out from the decision suggests that funding rules for collective actions may need more legislative attention – litigation funding was given some thought during the drafting of the opt-out action regime, but the legal framework for litigation funding remains fragmented and open to interpretation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: law ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3308
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Media, Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Competition, Markets and Regulation
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2024 14:30
Last Modified: 09 Nov 2024 00:53
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/96753
DOI: 10.1017/lst.2024.11

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item