Clarke, Paul ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6203-7632, Soe, Aung, Nichols, Amy, Harizaj, Helen, Webber, Mark A., Linsell, Louise, Bell, Jennifer L., Tremlett, Catherine, Muthukumar, Priyadarsini, Pattnayak, Santosh, Partlett, Christopher, King, Andrew, Juszczak, Ed and Heath, Paul T.
(2024)
2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial.
Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 109 (2).
pp. 202-210.
ISSN 1359-2998
Preview |
PDF (Clarke_etal_archdischild-2023-32587)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Objective: Catheter-related sepsis (CRS) is a major complication with significant morbidity and mortality. Evidence is lacking regarding the most appropriate antiseptic for skin disinfection before percutaneous central venous catheter (PCVC) insertion in preterm neonates. To inform the feasibility and design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) of two antiseptic formulations, we conducted the Antiseptic Randomised Controlled Trial for Insertion of Catheters (ARCTIC) feasibility study to assess catheter colonisation, sepsis, and skin morbidity. Design: Feasibility RCT. Setting: Two UK tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units. Patients: Preterm infants born <34 weeks' gestation scheduled to undergo PCVC insertion. Interventions: Skin disinfection with either 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-aqueous or 2% CHG-70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) before PCVC insertion and at removal. Primary outcome: Proportion in the 2% CHG-70% IPA arm with a colonised catheter at removal. Main feasibility outcomes: Rates of: (1) CRS, catheter-associated sepsis (CAS), and CRS/CAS per 1,000 PCVC days; (2) recruitment and retention; (3) data completeness. Safety outcomes: Daily skin morbidity scores recorded from catheter insertion until 48 hours post-removal. Results: 116 babies were randomised. Primary outcome incidence was 4.1% (95% confidence interval: 0.9% to 11.5%). Overall catheter colonisation rate was 5.2% (5/97); CRS 2.3/1000 catheter days; CAS 14.8/1000 catheter days. Recruitment, retention and data completeness were good. No major antiseptic-related skin injury was reported. Conclusions: A definitive comparative efficacy trial is feasible, but the very low catheter colonisation rate would make a large-scale RCT challenging due to the very large sample size required. ARCTIC provides preliminary reassurance supporting potential safe use of 2% CHG-70% IPA and 2% CHG-aqueous in preterm neonates. Trial registration number: ISRCTN82571474.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Funding information: The ARCTIC Trial was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Research for Patient Benefit Programme (Project ref: PB-PG-1013-32076). The funder provided advice and support and monitored study progress but did not have a role in study design or data collection, analysis and interpretation, or writing of the report. PC also received support for research time from the NNUH Charitable Fund and UEA Medical School. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | infectious disease medicine,microbiology,neonatology,sepsis,pediatrics, perinatology, and child health,obstetrics and gynaecology ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2735 |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2023 03:22 |
Last Modified: | 04 Mar 2024 18:21 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/93543 |
DOI: | 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325871 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |