Tools
Tools
Gorick, Hugh 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3089-9830, Smith, Toby O. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1673-2954, Mcgee, Marie, Wilson, Gemma, Williams, Emma and Patel, Jaimik
(2023)
Triage nurses decision-making processes: A qualitative systematic review.
In: RCN International Nursing Research Conference 2023, 2023-09-07 - 2023-09-08, University of Manchester.
Abstract
This concurrent conference paper will present the findings from a qualitative systematic review. Background: Understanding how nurses make acuity assessments on initial presentation to emergency departments is important. It affects how rapidly a patient is seen by a doctor and subsequent time to receive treatment. Whilst several literature reviews have previously explored this area, no qualitative systematic review has been published. Aims: This qualitative systematic review aimed to understand the decision-making processes emergency nurses use to make acuity decisions during triage assessment at initial patient presentation. Methodology: A systematic search was conducted of Medline, CINAHL and academic search complete. Papers were double screened with reviewers blinded to each other’s decisions. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklists were used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Themes were created using thematic synthesis. GRADE-CERQual was used to evaluate certainty of evidence in the findings. Results: 28 studies were included in the review. Data analysis resulted in the identification of three superordinate themes and seven subordinate themes. GRADE-CERQual analysis indicated nine themes presented with high certainty of evidence, and one with moderate certainty. Discussion: Nurses assess patients using holistic reasoning, gathering data which is then interpreted through a mix of clinical reasoning and intuition. The decision-making process is influenced by the situational awareness of the nurses, with strong impact from environmental factors. These processes are supported by the nurse’s knowledge and experience, and training for these is vital, although considered lacking. Conclusions: The findings present a new perspective on how nurses make decisions about the acuity of patients in the emergency department. From this, we can offer suggestions on improvements to the triage system that work with the nurses’ decision-making processes, increasing acceptability and effectiveness, and resulting in improved patient outcomes.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Other) |
|---|---|
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Dementia & Complexity in Later Life Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health |
| Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2023 10:30 |
| Last Modified: | 16 Sep 2024 15:30 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/93039 |
| DOI: |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |