The risk of harm whilst waiting for varicose veins procedure

Bootun, Roshan, Burrows, Mandy, Chowdhury, Mohammed M., Stather, Philip W. ORCID: and Al-Jundi, Wissam (2023) The risk of harm whilst waiting for varicose veins procedure. Phlebology, 38 (1). pp. 22-27. ISSN 0268-3555

[thumbnail of Veins-Manuscript-Phlebology-REVISION] Microsoft Word (OpenXML) (Veins-Manuscript-Phlebology-REVISION) - Accepted Version
Download (127kB)


Introduction: Varicose veins (VV) negatively impact quality of life (QoL) and have risks of major complications including bleeding, ulceration and phlebitis. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the VSGBI (Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland) and GIRFT (Get It Right First Time) classified VVs as lowest priority for intervention. Objective: This study aims to determine harm caused and the impact on the QoL on patients waiting for their VVs procedures for more than 1 year. Methods: This was a prospective study conducted at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH). Patients with VVs awaiting intervention for >1 year were included in the study. Patients with CEAP C6 disease were considered to be too high risk to be invited for treatment during the Covid-19 pandemic. Patients were sent QoL questionnaires and underwent a telephone consultation to assess harm. Both generic (EQ-VAS and EQ-5D) and disease-specific (AVVQ and CIVIQ-14) instruments were utilised. There were no control groups available for comparison. Results: 275 patients were identified (37.1% male) with median time on waiting list of 60 weeks (IQR 56–65). 19 patients (6.9%) came to major harm, including phlebitis (3.6%), bleeding (1.8%) and ulceration (1.8%). Fifty-two patients (18.9%) had minor harm, including worsening pain (12.7%) and swelling (6.2%). 6.9% reported psychological harm. Rising CEAP stage was also associated with worsening level of harm in patients with C5-6 disease (p < 0.0001). Only 8.7% stated they would decline surgery during the pandemic. 104 QoL questionnaires were returned. Median EQ-VAS and EQ-5D was 75 (IQR: 60–85) and 0.685 (0.566–0.761), respectively. Median AVVQ score was 23.2 (14.9–31.0) and CIVIQ-14 score was 33 (21–44). ConclusionsThis study highlights the impact of delaying VVs surgery during a pandemic. A significant rate of both major and minor as well as psychological harm was reported. In addition, VVs had a significant detriment to quality of life.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.
Uncontrolled Keywords: covid-19 pandemic,quality of life,varicose vein,waiting list,cardiology and cardiovascular medicine,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2705
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2023 09:30
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2023 09:30
DOI: 10.1177/02683555221141824


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item