Hulme, Matthew C., Hayatbakhsh, Armita, Brignall, Rachel M., Gilbert, Nicolas, Costello, Andrew, Schofield, Christopher J., Williamson, David C., Kemsley, E. Kate ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-3883, Sutcliffe, Oliver B. and Mewis, Ryan E. (2023) Detection, discrimination and quantification of amphetamine, cathinone and nor-ephedrine regioisomers using benchtop 1H and 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, 61 (2). pp. 73-82. ISSN 0749-1581
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Amphetamine and cathinone derivatives are abused recreationally due to the sense of euphoria they provide to the user. Methodologies for the rapid detection of the drug derivative present in a seized sample, or an indication of the drug class, are beneficial to law enforcement and healthcare providers. Identifying the drug class is prudent because derivatisation of these drugs, to produce regioisomers, for example, occurs frequently to circumvent global and local drug laws. Thus, newly encountered derivatives might not be present in a spectral library. Employment of benchtop nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) could be used to provide rapid analysis of seized samples as well as identifying the class of drug present. Discrimination of individual amphetamine-, methcathinone-, N-ethylcathinone and nor-ephedrine-derived fluorinated and methylated regioisomers is achieved herein using qualitative automated 1H NMR analysis and compared to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) data. Two seized drug samples, SS1 and SS2, were identified to contain 4-fluoroamphetamine by 1H NMR (match score median = 0.9933) and GC–MS (RRt = 5.42–5.43 min). The amount of 4-fluoroamphetamine present was 42.8%–43.4% w/w and 48.7%–49.2% w/w for SS1 and SS2, respectively, from quantitative 19F NMR analysis, which is in agreement with the amount determined by GC–MS (39.9%–41.4% w/w and 49.0%–49.3% w/w). The total time for the qualitative 1H NMR and quantitative 19F NMR analysis is ~10 min. This contrasts to ~40 min for the GC–MS method. The NMR method also benefits from minimal sample preparation. Thus, benchtop NMR affords rapid, and discriminatory, analysis of the drug present in a seized sample.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Special Issue: NMR in Forensics Research Funding: Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies. Grant Number: 206375; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Grant Number: 396154510; Oxford Instruments; Manchester Metropolitan University |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Science > School of Chemistry |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 08 Feb 2023 14:30 |
Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2023 14:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/91080 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mrc.5156 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |