Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain: qualitative findings from the Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder programme

Saunders, Benjamin, Burton, Claire, van der Windt, Danielle, Myers, Helen, Chester, Rachel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1979-0682, Pincus, Tamar and Wynne-Jones, Gwen (2023) Patients’ and clinicians’ perspectives towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain: qualitative findings from the Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder programme. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24. ISSN 1471-2474

[thumbnail of Saunders_etal_2023_BMCMSD]
Preview
PDF (Saunders_etal_2023_BMCMSD) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Clinical management of musculoskeletal shoulder pain can be challenging due to diagnostic uncertainty, variable prognosis and limited evidence for long-term treatment benefits. The UK-based PANDA-S programme (Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder) is investigating short and long-term shoulder pain outcomes. This paper reports linked qualitative research exploring patients’ and clinicians’ views towards primary care consultations for shoulder pain. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and 15 primary care clinicians. Twenty-two interviews (11 patients, 11 clinicians) were conducted as matched patient-clinician ‘dyads’. Data were analysed thematically. Results: Clinicians reported attempts to involve patients in management decisions; however, there was variation in whether patients preferred treatment choice, or for decisions to be clinician-led. Some patients felt uncertain about the decisions made, due to a lack of discussion about available management options. Many General Practitioners expressed a lack of confidence in diagnosing the underlying cause of shoulder pain. Patients reported either not being given a diagnosis, or receiving different diagnoses from different professionals, resulting in confusion. Whilst clinicians reported routinely discussing prognosis of shoulder pain, patients reported that prognosis was not raised. Patients also expressed concern that their shoulder pain could be caused by serious pathology; however, clinicians felt that this was not a common concern for patients. Conclusions: Findings showed disparities between patients’ and clinicians’ views towards shoulder pain consultations, indicating a need for improved patient-clinician communication. Findings will inform the design of an intervention to support treatment and referral decisions for shoulder pain that will be tested in a randomised controlled trial.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding: This study is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme in collaboration with Versus Arthritis (RP-PG-0615-20002). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Uncontrolled Keywords: diagnosis,general practice,primary care,prognosis,qualitative,shoulder pain,rheumatology,orthopedics and sports medicine ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2745
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Rehabilitation
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 15 Dec 2022 04:10
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2023 03:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/90165
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06059-1

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item