Effect of virtual reality and whole-body heating on motion sickness severity: A combined and individual stressors approach

Arnold, Josh T. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-2000, O'Keeffe, Kate, McDaniel, Chloe, Hodder, Simon and Lloyd, Alex (2019) Effect of virtual reality and whole-body heating on motion sickness severity: A combined and individual stressors approach. Displays, 60. pp. 18-23.

Preview

PDF (Arnold_VR_Manuscript_DISPLA_2018_195) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (442kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) use is limited by the potential side effects of prolonged exposure to vection, leading to motion sickness. Air temperature (Ta) may exacerbate the severity of such side effects through a synergistic interaction. This study assessed the individual and combined impact of a hot Ta and VR on motion sickness severity. Method: Thirteen healthy volunteers were exposed to a 20 min visual stimulus, across four experimental conditions: N_CS: 22 °C Ta with computer screen; N_VR: 22 °C Ta with VR; H_CS: 35 °C Ta with computer screen; H_VR: 35 °C Ta with VR. Motion sickness was assessed via fast motion sickness scale (FMS) and simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ). Physiological indices of motion sickness including, sweat rate, rectal temperature, cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC), skin temperature, blood pressure and heart rate were also examined. Results: FMS and SSQ ratings indicate a significant main effect for VR, increasing sickness severity (p < 0.001). A significant main effect of Ta was observed for SSQ, but not FMS ratings (FMS, p = 0.07; SSQ, p < 0.04). Despite trends towards synergism, no interaction (Ta × VR) was observed for FMS (p = 0.2) or SSQ scores (p = 0.07), indicating an additive response. Synergistic trends were also observed for sweat rate and CVC. Conclusion: Synergism between VR and heat on motion sickness remains unclear, possibly as a result of considerable inter-individual variation in the reported subjective responses. Understanding of the questions raised by this study inform safe working guidelines for the use of VR in commercial and occupational settings.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	15 Dec 2022 03:52
Last Modified:	06 Jun 2024 15:22
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/90080
DOI:	10.1016/j.displa.2019.08.007

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item