Read, Rupert (2003) Against 'time-slices'. Philosophical Investigations, 26 (1). pp. 24-43. ISSN 1467-9205
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
The concept of ‘time–slice’ turns out to be at best philosophically inconsequential, I argue. Influential philosophies of time as apparently diverse as those of Dummett, Lewis and Bergson, thus must come to grief. The very idea of ‘time–slice’ upon which they rest – the very idea of spatialising time, and of rendering the resulting ‘slices’ of potentially infinitely small measure – turns out on closer acquaintance not to amount to anything consequential that has yet been made sense of. Time is, rather, a ubiquitous lived ‘tool’ for the organisation and co–ordination of human activities, a tool so completely involved in those activities that Anti–Realism about it is as unstateable as Realism about it is unnecessary.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Wittgenstein |
Depositing User: | EPrints Services |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2010 13:56 |
Last Modified: | 10 Aug 2023 12:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/8917 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1467-9205.00184 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |