Collins, John (2005) On the input problem for massive modularity. Minds and Machines, 15 (2). pp. 1-22. ISSN 1572-8641
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Jerry Fodor argues that the massive modularity thesis – the claim that (human) cognition is wholly served by domain specific, autonomous computational devices, i.e., modules – is a priori incoherent, self-defeating. The thesis suffers from what Fodor dubs the ‘input problem’: the function of a given module (proprietarily understood) in a wholly modular system presupposes non-modular processes. It will be argued that massive modularity suffers from no such a priori problem. Fodor, however, also offers what he describes as a ‘really real’ input problem (i.e., an empirical one). It will be suggested that this problem is real enough, but it does not selectively strike down massive modularity – it is a problem for everyone.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Philosophy (former - to 2014) |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy |
Depositing User: | EPrints Services |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2010 13:56 |
Last Modified: | 10 Aug 2023 13:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/8870 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11023-004-1346-5 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |