Collins, John (2003) Cowie on the Poverty of Stimulus. Synthese, 136 (2). pp. 159-190. ISSN 1573-0964
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
My paper defends the use of the poverty of stimulus argument (POSA) for linguistic nativism against Cowie's (1999) counter-claim that it leaves empiricism untouched. I first present the linguistic POSA as arising from a reflection on the generality of the child's initial state in comparison with the specific complexity of its final state. I then show that Cowie misconstrues the POSA as a direct argument about the character of the pld. In this light, I first argue that the data Cowie marshals about the pld does not begin to suggest that the POSA is unsound. Second, through a discussion of the so-called `auxiliary inversion rule', I show, by way of diagnosis, that Cowie misunderstands both the methodology of current linguistics and the complexity of the data it is obliged to explain.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies (former - to 2024) | 
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy | 
| Depositing User: | EPrints Services | 
| Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2010 13:56 | 
| Last Modified: | 13 Oct 2025 23:36 | 
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/8867 | 
| DOI: | 10.1023/A:1024738522031 | 
Actions (login required)
|  | View Item | 
 
         Tools
 Tools Tools
 Tools