Collins, John (2003) Cowie on the Poverty of Stimulus. Synthese, 136 (2). pp. 159-190. ISSN 1573-0964
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
My paper defends the use of the poverty of stimulus argument (POSA) for linguistic nativism against Cowie's (1999) counter-claim that it leaves empiricism untouched. I first present the linguistic POSA as arising from a reflection on the generality of the child's initial state in comparison with the specific complexity of its final state. I then show that Cowie misconstrues the POSA as a direct argument about the character of the pld. In this light, I first argue that the data Cowie marshals about the pld does not begin to suggest that the POSA is unsound. Second, through a discussion of the so-called `auxiliary inversion rule', I show, by way of diagnosis, that Cowie misunderstands both the methodology of current linguistics and the complexity of the data it is obliged to explain.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies (former - to 2024) |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy |
Depositing User: | EPrints Services |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2010 13:56 |
Last Modified: | 24 Sep 2024 10:09 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/8867 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1024738522031 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |