Collins, John (2002) On the very idea of a science forming faculty. Dialectica, 56 (2). pp. 125-151. ISSN 1746-8361
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
It has been speculated, by Chomsky and others, that our capacity for scientific understanding is not only enabled but also limited by a biologically endowed science forming faculty (SFF). I look at two sorts of consideration for the SFF thesis and find both wanting. Firstly, it has been claimed that a problem-mystery distinction militates for the SFF thesis. I suggest that the distinction can be coherently drawn for cases, but that the purported‘evidence’for even a fairly lose general demarcation of problems and mysteries is not best explained by a SFF. Secondly, I consider in detail a range of cognitive considerations for the SFF thesis and contend that it is at best moot whether science can be so construed as to make it feasible that it is a faculty competence.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies (former - to 2024) |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy |
Depositing User: | EPrints Services |
Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2010 13:56 |
Last Modified: | 24 Sep 2024 10:16 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/8865 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2002.tb00235.x |
Actions (login required)
View Item |