Natural language quantification is not polysemous

Collins, John (2022) Natural language quantification is not polysemous. Synthese, 200 (5). ISSN 0039-7857

Preview

PDF (s11229-022-03773-0) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (366kB) | Preview

Abstract

The paper argues that natural language quantification, as expressed by determiner phrases, is not polysemous. The foil for this claim is Hofweber (Ontology and the ambitions of metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2016; Mind, 128:699–734, 2019), who contends that natural language quantification is polysemous between a domain reading and an inferential reading. The thesis is intended to support a more general division between externalist and internalist positions in semantics. The paper, to the contrary, argues that there is no linguistic evidence for polysemous quantification, and Hofweber’s proposal proves to be non-compositional. Further, an approach at least consistent with internalism is available independent of an inferential reading, for natural language quantification can be read as ontologically neutral, which removes the rationale for the polysemy hypothesis. The paper remains neutral on so-called heavyweight (thick) vs. lightweight (thin) construals of quantification, which are not claims about natural language semantics.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	compositionality,inference,ontological commitment,quantification,philosophy,social sciences(all) ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1200/1211
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?...
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	12 Sep 2022 13:33
Last Modified:	21 Jul 2023 09:59
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/88192
DOI:	10.1007/s11229-022-03773-0

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item