Echo planar imaging–induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification

Westenberg, Jos J. M., van Assen, Hans C., van den Boogaard, Pieter J., Goeman, Jelle J., Saaid, Hicham, Voorneveld, Jason, Bosch, Johan, Kenjeres, Sasa, Claessens, Tom, Garg, Pankaj ORCID:, Kouwenhoven, Marc and Lamb, Hildo J. (2022) Echo planar imaging–induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI quantification. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 87 (5). pp. 2398-2411. ISSN 0740-3194

[thumbnail of Magnetic Resonance in Med - 2021 - Westenberg - Echo planar imaging induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI]
PDF (Magnetic Resonance in Med - 2021 - Westenberg - Echo planar imaging induced errors in intracardiac 4D flow MRI) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB) | Preview


Purpose: To assess errors associated with EPI-accelerated intracardiac 4D flow MRI (4DEPI) with EPI factor 5, compared with non-EPI gradient echo (4DGRE). Methods: Three 3T MRI experiments were performed comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE: steady flow through straight tubes, pulsatile flow in a left-ventricle phantom, and intracardiac flow in 10 healthy volunteers. For each experiment, 4DEPI was repeated with readout and blip phase-encoding gradient in different orientations, parallel or perpendicular to the flow direction. In vitro flow rates were compared with timed volumetric collection. In the left-ventricle phantom and in vivo, voxel-based speed and spatio-temporal median speed were compared between sequences, as well as mitral and aortic transvalvular net forward volume. Results: In steady-flow phantoms, the flow rate error was largest (12%) for high velocity (>2 m/s) with 4DEPI readout gradient parallel to the flow. Voxel-based speed and median speed in the left-ventricle phantom were ≤5.5% different between sequences. In vivo, mean net forward volume inconsistency was largest (6.4 ± 8.5%) for 4DEPI with nonblip phase-encoding gradient parallel to the main flow. The difference in median speed for 4DEPI versus 4DGRE was largest (9%) when the 4DEPI readout gradient was parallel to the flow. Conclusions: Velocity and flow rate are inaccurate for 4DEPI with EPI factor 5 when flow is parallel to the readout or blip phase-encoding gradient. However, mean differences in flow rate, voxel-based speed, and spatio-temporal median speed were acceptable (≤10%) when comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE for intracardiac flow in healthy volunteers.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Funding Information: Dutch Heart Foundation; Grant No. CVON2017‐08‐RADAR (for H.C.v.A.)
Uncontrolled Keywords: 4d flow mri,echo planar imaging,intracardiac blood flow,phase-contrast mri,radiology nuclear medicine and imaging ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2741
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 07 Sep 2022 13:30
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2022 18:30
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29112

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item