Prevalence of the dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

White, William F., Burgess, Aaron, Dalgleish, Tim, Halligan, Sarah L., Hiller, Rachel M., Oxley, Anna, Smith, Patrick and Meiser-Stedman, Richard ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-623X (2022) Prevalence of the dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 52 (9). pp. 1629-1644. ISSN 0033-2917

[thumbnail of Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (822kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Supplementary Information] Microsoft Word (OpenXML) (Supplementary Information) - Accepted Version
Download (245kB)

Abstract

The dissociative subtype of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-DS) was introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and is characterised by symptoms of either depersonalisation or derealisation, in addition to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to estimate the point prevalence of current PTSD-DS, and the extent to which method of assessment, demographic and trauma variables moderate this estimate, across different methods of prevalence estimation. Studies included were identified by searching MEDLINE (EBSCO), PsycInfo, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete and PTSDpubs, yielding 49 studies that met the inclusion criteria (N = 8214 participants). A random-effects meta-analysis estimated the prevalence of PTSD-DS as 38.1% (95% CI 31.5–45.0%) across all samples, 45.5% (95% CI 37.7–53.4%) across all diagnosis-based and clinical cut-off samples, 22.8% (95% CI 14.8–32.0%) across all latent class analysis (LCA) and latent profile analysis (LPA) samples and 48.1% (95% CI 35.0–61.3%) across samples which strictly used the DSM-5 PTSD criteria; all as a proportion of those already with a diagnosis of PTSD. All results were characterised by high levels of heterogeneity, limiting generalisability. Moderator analyses mostly failed to identify sources of heterogeneity. PTSD-DS was more prevalent in children compared to adults, and in diagnosis-based and clinical cut-off samples compared to LCA and LPA samples. Risk of bias was not significantly related to prevalence estimates. The implications of these results are discussed further.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: meta-analysis,post-traumatic stress disorder,prevalence,systematic review,meta-analysis,psychiatry and mental health,applied psychology ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2738
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Mental Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Jun 2022 14:30
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2023 03:20
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/85780
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722001647

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item