The Peterborough Exemplar: a protocol to evaluate the impact and implementation of a new patient-centred, system-wide community mental healthcare model in England

Efstathopoulou, Lida, Jagger, Grace, Mackenzie, Jules, Faulkner, Kathryn, Barker-Barrett, Trish, Cameron, Rory ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7442-0935, Wagner, Adam P. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-3477 and Perez, Jesus (2022) The Peterborough Exemplar: a protocol to evaluate the impact and implementation of a new patient-centred, system-wide community mental healthcare model in England. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20. ISSN 1478-4505

[thumbnail of Efstathopoulou_etal_HealthResPolicySystems_2022]
Preview
PDF (Efstathopoulou_etal_HealthResPolicySystems_2022) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (861kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Community mental healthcare has significantly grown since de-institutionalization. Despite progress, service fragmentation and gaps in service provision remain key barriers to effective community care in England. Recent mental healthcare policies highlighted the need to transform service provision by developing patient-centred, joined-up community mental healthcare. In response to policy guidance, a system-wide community mental healthcare model was developed in Peterborough (England). The “Peterborough Exemplar” is based on two main pillars: (1) the creation of knowledge exchange pathways to strengthen interorganizational relationships, and (2) the development of new, accessible community services addressing existing service gaps. This paper presents the protocol developed to evaluate the Peterborough Exemplar. Methods: A quasi-experimental design with an intervention group and a nonequivalent comparator group has been developed to compare service provision provided in Peterborough pre- and post-intervention with services provided in Fenland, a neighbouring area where service users access usual care. Two evaluation methods will be employed to compare service provision between the two groups: (1) outcome measures completed by service users and carers will be analysed to assess quality of life and service satisfaction, and (2) service activity data will be analysed to assess service usage. In addition, qualitative interviews will be conducted with staff members of participating organizations to explore the implementation of the Exemplar in Peterborough and evaluate knowledge exchange processes among local service providers. A matched control approach will be used to compare outcome measures between the two areas. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square tests, will be used to analyse service activity data and examine differences between the two areas. A thematic analysis will be adopted to analyse qualitative data. Discussion: Outcomes of the evaluation will contribute to understanding the contribution of the Peterborough Exemplar on mental health service provision locally. Evaluation findings and intermediate reporting will be shared with organizations involved in the implementation of the Peterborough Exemplar and with local decision-makers to inform the Exemplar delivery. As the Peterborough Exemplar is an Early Implementer (EI) site funded by NHS England, findings will be shared with policy-makers to inform national policy on community mental healthcare and integrated care.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Acknowledgements: We would like to thank service users participating in the PPI group and Peterborough Exemplar partners for their input in the evaluation of the Peterborough Exemplar [Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT), Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG), Peterborough City Council, Cambridgeshire, Peterborough, and South Lincolnshire (CPSL) MIND charity, SUN Network, and Greater Peterborough Network (GPN)]. This evaluation is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East of England. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Uncontrolled Keywords: adult mental health services,community mental healthcare model,service evaluation,health policy,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2719
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Economics
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 11 Feb 2022 10:30
Last Modified: 11 Jan 2024 01:36
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/83415
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00819-0

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item