The Measurement of Well-being at Work

Daniels, Kevin ORCID:, Russell, Emma, Michaelides, George ORCID:, Nasamu, Emike and Connolly, Sara ORCID: (2023) The Measurement of Well-being at Work. In: Organisational Stress and Well-Being. Cambridge University Press, pp. 347-386. ISBN 9781009268332

[thumbnail of Ch11 Daniels et al The measurement of wellbeing]
PDF (Ch11 Daniels et al The measurement of wellbeing) - Accepted Version
Available under License Unspecified licence.

Download (317kB) | Preview


Wellbeing has a prominent profile in many academic disciplines. For example, in philosophy, there is Aristotle’s conception of wellbeing as associated with human flourishing or ‘eudaimonia’. In political theory, Utilitarianism defines the main goals of policy as maximising pleasure and minimising gain (Bache & Reardon, 2016). Much more recently, some national political leaders, as well as political theorists/scientists, have become interested in wellbeing as an alternative marker of national progress to economic measures such as gross domestic product. Although there are many debates on the nature of wellbeing, the dominant view is that wellbeing is inherently a psychological construct (O’Donnell et al., 2014). Thus, psychological approaches to measuring wellbeing provide a platform for indexing the effectiveness of policy decisions made at all levels, from workplaces through to nation states (Layard, 2006). In relation to the workplace, such policies may include those directed at reducing absence rates or securing sustainable productivity gains without threatening worker health, wherein psychological wellbeing may serve as a leading indicator. At regional, national or even supra-national level, relevant policies pertain to labour market regulation and workplace health and safety. As such, the purpose of this chapter is to outline some of the main and emerging issues in the measurement of workplace wellbeing. We consider both positive markers of wellbeing (e.g., job satisfaction) and markers developed from research focused on indexing psychologically harmful effects of working practices.

Item Type: Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords: wellbeing,well-being,psychometrics,measurement,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Employment Systems and Institutions
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Research on Children and Families
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 06 Jan 2021 00:34
Last Modified: 01 Aug 2023 01:38
DOI: 10.1017/9781009268332.015

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item