Towers, Ann-Marie, Killett, Anne ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-8365, Handley, M., Almack, Kathryn, Backhouse, Tamara ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-4174, Bunn, Diane, Bunn, F., Dickinson, A., Mathie, E., Mayrhofer, A., Mikelyte, R. and Goodman, C. (2020) Producing ‘Top Tips’ for care home staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: rapid reviews inform evidence-based practice but reveal major gaps. Journal of Long-Term Care, 2020. pp. 151-166. ISSN 2516-9122
Preview |
PDF (References for each expert review)
Download (710kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Image (PNG) (Fig 1 a and b swapped)
- Accepted Version
Download (708kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (Accepted_Manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Download (492kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (All TopTips combined)
- Accepted Version
Download (260kB) | Preview |
Preview |
Image (PNG) (Fig 2 a and b swapped)
- Accepted Version
Download (702kB) | Preview |
Preview |
PDF (Published_Version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Context: The work presented in this paper was undertaken during the first three months of the COVID-19 crisis in the UK. Objectives: The project aimed to respond to questions and concerns raised by front-line care staff during this time, by producing research-based ‘Top Tips’ to complement emerging COVID-19 policy and practice guidelines. Methods: Eight rapid, expert reviews of published, multidisciplinary research evidence were conducted to help answer care home workers’ questions about ‘how’ to support residents, family members and each other at a time of unprecedented pressure and grief and adhere to guidance on self-distancing and isolation. A review of the emerging policy guidelines published up to the end of April 2020 was also undertaken. Findings: The rapid reviews revealed gaps in research evidence, with research having a lot to say about what care homes should do and far less about how they should do it. The policy review highlighted the expectations and demands placed on managers and direct care workers as the pandemic spread across the UK. Implications: This paper highlights the value of working with the sector to co-design and co-produce research and pathways to knowledge with those who live, work and care in care homes. To have a real impact on care practice, research in care homes needs to go beyond telling homes ‘what’ to do by working with them to find out ‘how’.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | Funding Information: This work was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East of England and the cross-ARC care home research collaboration. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | covid-19,care homes,expert review,policy review,skilled care,social care,health(social science),health professions (miscellaneous) ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3306 |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > UEA Hydrate Group Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Dementia & Complexity in Later Life Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Water Security Research Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 30 Sep 2020 23:58 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2023 02:47 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/77056 |
DOI: | 10.31389/jltc.43 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |