Recalibrating burdens of blame: Anti-swidden politics and green governance in the Philippine uplands

Dressler, Wolfram H., Smith, Will, Kull, Christian A., Carmenta, Rachel ORCID: and Pulhim, Juan M. (2021) Recalibrating burdens of blame: Anti-swidden politics and green governance in the Philippine uplands. Geoforum, 124 (6). pp. 348-359. ISSN 0016-7185

[thumbnail of AcceptedManuscript] Microsoft Word (OpenXML) (AcceptedManuscript) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (4MB)


In Southeast Asia, the presence of cleared and burned forests has long evoked deep emotions, symbolism and representations that powerfully inform the governance of forests and upland peoples. In particular, the palpable visibility of shifting (swidden) agriculturalists ‘slashing and burning’ forests has fuelled centuries-old political agendas to criminalise swidden farmers for supposedly destroying swaths of forests valued for timber, biodiversity and now ecosystem services. Swidden farmers who regularly clear and burn forests, have endured a disproportionate burden of blame for investing in and maintaining an old livelihood practice into the 21st Century. Drawing on Hall’s politics of representation, we examine the contrasting political frames, management and practices of clearing and burning forests among upland farmers, state and non-state actors who govern forests on Palawan Island, the Philippines. We describe the social, economic, and biophysical character of swidden clearing and burning among the indigenous Tagbanua of central Palawan, whose livelihoods and landscapes are impacted by green governance and enclosures. Informed by several years of ethnographic fieldwork, we explore how and why Tagbanua farmers continue to clear and burn forest despite state and non-state actors criminalising these practices for decades. We argue that, despite sustained vilification and reduced fallows arising from governance policies and enclosures, Tagbanua farmers continue to clear and burn knowing well that, despite the practices being illegal, levels of tolerance and leniency toward swidden is the local norm, rather than exception—highlighting the importance of what we call ‘atmospheres of consent’. Ethnoecological understandings of clearing and burning in the uplands, we argue, are crucial to recalibrating the burden of blame placed on poor farmers whose agriculture is deemed destructive by the region’s burgeoning sustainability discourse.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: criminalisation,ethnoecology,fire practices,philippines,resistant,swidden,sociology and political science ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3312
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of International Development
University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA
UEA Research Groups: University of East Anglia Schools > Faculty of Science > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Global Environmental Justice
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 25 Sep 2020 23:55
Last Modified: 13 May 2023 17:31
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.024

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item