Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey

Mylvaganam, Senthurun, Conroy, Elizabeth J., Williamson, Paula R., Barnes, Nicola L. P., Cutress, Ramsey I., Gardiner, Matthew D., Jain, Abhilash, Skillman, Joanna M., Thrush, Steven, Whisker, Lisa J., Blazeby, Jane M., Potter, Shelley and Holcombe, Christopher and on behalf of the iBRA Steering Group, Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative (2018) Adherence to best practice consensus guidelines for implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire survey. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 44. pp. 708-716. ISSN 0748-7983

Preview

PDF (Published_Version) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (319kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: The 2008 National Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Audit demonstrated marked variation in the practice and outcomes of breast reconstruction in the UK. To standardise practice and improve outcomes for patients, the British professional associations developed best-practice guidelines with specific guidance for newer mesh-assisted implant-based techniques. We explored the degree of uptake of best-practice guidelines within units performing implant-based reconstruction (IBBR) as the first phase of the implant Breast Reconstruction Evaluation (iBRA) study. Methods: A questionnaire developed by the iBRA Steering Group was completed by trainee and consultant leads at breast and plastic surgical units across the UK. Simple summary statistics were calculated for each survey item to assess compliance with current best-practice guidelines. Results: 81 units from 79 NHS Trusts completed the questionnaire. Marked variation was observed in adherence to guidelines, especially those relating to clinical governance and infection prevention strategies. Less than half (n = 28, 47%) of units obtained local clinical governance board approval prior to offering new mesh-based techniques and prospective audit of the clinical, cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes of surgery was infrequent. Most units screened for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus prior to surgery but fewer than 1 in 3 screened for methicillin-sensitive strains. Laminar-flow theatres (recommended for IBBR) were not widely-available with less than 1 in 5 units having regular access. Peri-operative antibiotics were widely-used, but the type and duration were highly-variable. Conclusions: The iBRA national practice questionnaire has demonstrated variation in reported practice and adherence to IBBR guidelines. High-quality evidence is urgently required to inform best practice.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School Faculty of Science > School of Biological Sciences
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?...
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	03 Sep 2020 23:57
Last Modified:	31 Jan 2024 02:44
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/76758
DOI:	10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.098

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item