Guidance on conducting and reviewing systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) in work and organizational psychology

Daniels, Kevin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8620-886X (2019) Guidance on conducting and reviewing systematic reviews (and meta-analyses) in work and organizational psychology. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28 (1). pp. 1-10. ISSN 1359-432X

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (578kB) | Preview

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are means of summarizing and synthesizing research evidence in a given topic area. They can be used to define the current state of knowledge and how confident we can be in that knowledge, to identify evidence gaps, and to provide recommendations for policy and practice based on the best available evidence. At European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, our editorial stance is explicitly to encourage the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The purpose of this editorial is to provide some guidance to authors and journal referees on the (technical) features of good systematic reviews.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: systematic review method,work and organizational psychology,evidence based decision making
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Employment Systems and Institutions
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 12 Nov 2018 09:30
Last Modified: 21 Oct 2022 20:33
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/68826
DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2018.1547708

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item