Distinguishing emission-associated ambient air PM2.5 concentrations and meteorological factor-induced fluctuations

Zhong, Qirui, Ma, Jianmin, Shen, Guofeng, Shen, Huizhong, Zhu, Xi, Yun, Xiao, Meng, Wenjun, Cheng, Hefa, Liu, Junfeng, Li, Bengang, Wang, Xilong, Zeng, Eddy Y., Guan, Dabo and Tao, Shu (2018) Distinguishing emission-associated ambient air PM2.5 concentrations and meteorological factor-induced fluctuations. Environmental Science & Technology, 52 (18). pp. 10416-10425. ISSN 0013-936X

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (928kB) | Preview


Although PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 μm) in the air originates from emissions, its concentrations are often affected by confounding meteorological effects. Therefore, direct comparisons of PM2.5 concentrations made across two periods, which are commonly used by environmental protection administrations to measure the effectiveness of mitigation efforts, can be misleading. Here, we developed a two-step method to distinguish the significance of emissions and meteorological factors and assess the effectiveness of emission mitigation efforts. We modeled ambient PM2.5 concentrations from 1980 to 2014 based on three conditional scenarios: realistic conditions, fixed emissions, and fixed meteorology. The differences found between the model outputs were analyzed to quantify the relative contributions of emissions and meteorological factors. Emission-related gridded PM2.5 concentrations excluding the meteorological effects were predicted using multivariate regression models, whereas meteorological confounding effects on PM2.5 fluctuations were characterized by probabilistic functions. When the regression models and probabilistic functions were combined, fluctuations in the PM2.5 concentrations induced by emissions and meteorological factors were quantified for all model grid cells and regions. The method was then applied to assess the historical and future trends of PM2.5 concentrations and potential fluctuations on global, national, and city scales. The proposed method may thus be used to assess the effectiveness of mitigation actions.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development)
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Water Security Research Centre
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 05 Nov 2018 11:30
Last Modified: 03 Aug 2023 12:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/68767
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02685


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item