Tools
ToolsSatyal, Poshendra (2018) Civil society participation in REDD+ and FLEGT processes:Case study analysis from Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo. Forest Policy and Economics, 97. pp. 83-96. ISSN 1389-9341
Preview |
PDF (Accepted manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (332kB) | Preview |
Abstract
REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) and FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade) are two initiatives with roots at an international scale that aim to influence national and local level forest governance. This paper looks to understand how the breadth and depth of participation of different types of actors, most particularly civil society, compares between these initiatives and in what ways the structure of the governance arrangement and/or the focus of commodities may influence this participation. The paper presents findings from an assessment study on the dynamics of participation of civil society actors in REDD+ and FLEGT processes in four countries of Central and Western Africa: Cameroon, Ghana, Liberia and the Republic of Congo. Building on key civil society participation literature, a questionnaire tool was developed and applied in these countries. The analysis is drawn from interviews based on the questionnaire tool, some in-depth interviews and secondary research. The study finds that there is a growing recognition of civil society participation in national policy making of forest governance in the four countries, and a majority of the civil society organisations are participating in REDD+ and FLEGT processes. The quality and degree of their participation (that can range from informing to empowering) however, varies between FLEGT and REDD+ (i.e. FLEGT being more accommodative than REDD+), among a diversity of these actors and the studied countries. The difference in participation between REDD+ and FLEGT is related to the design of these two processes, the general lack of time and financial investment and the technical nature of REDD+ consultations. Moreover, FLEGT has been more inclusive and participatory right from the beginning whereas participatory spaces are generally lacking in REDD+ process, most particularly in its initial stages. As REDD+ and FLEGT processes are being consolidated in these countries and worldwide, this paper provides several avenues of interventions needed to address gaps on participation, such as strengthening participatory platforms, addressing representation deficit for community groups and focusing on capacity building of civil society actors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | civil society,participation,redd+,flegt,policy making,africa |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Climate Change Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Global Environmental Justice |
| Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 01 Oct 2018 15:30 |
| Last Modified: | 13 May 2023 00:40 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/68399 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.012 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |