Schoenefeld, Jonas and Jordan, Andrew (2017) Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology. Evaluation, 23 (3). 274–293. ISSN 1356-3890

Preview	PDF (Schoenefeld Jordan_Governing Evaluation_Accepted for publication) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (484kB) | Preview
Preview	PDF (Schoenefeld_Jordan_Evaluation_2017) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (564kB) | Preview

Abstract

As policy evaluation matures, thoughts are turning to its governance. However, few scholars have combined insights from the evaluation and governance literatures to shed new light on this matter. In order to address this important gap, this article develops a new typology of ways to comprehend and perhaps ultimately govern ex-post policy evaluation activities. The article then explores its validity in the context of climate policy evaluation activities, a vibrant policy area in which the demand for and practices of evaluation have grown fast, particularly in Europe. The analysis reveals that the typology usefully guides new thinking, but also highlights important gaps in our empirical knowledge of the various modes of governing policy evaluation. The article identifies a need for a new research agenda that simultaneously develops a fuller understanding of these evaluation practices and the options for governing them.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	sdg 13 - climate action ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/climate_action
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia > Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Depositing User:	Pure Connector
Date Deposited:	21 Jun 2017 05:06
Last Modified:	10 Nov 2021 05:49
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63792
DOI:	10.1177/1356389017715366

Actions (login required)

View Item