Bakitas, Marie A., El-Jawahri, Areej, Farquhar, Morag ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-7679, Ferrell, Betty, Grudzen, Corita, Higginson, Irene, Temel, Jennifer S., Zimmerman, Camilla and Smith, Thomas J. (2017) The TEAM approach to improving oncology outcomes by incorporating palliative care in practice. Journal of Oncology Practice, 13 (9). pp. 557-566. ISSN 1935-469X
Preview |
PDF (Published manuscript)
- Published Version
Download (707kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Palliative care (PC) concurrent with usual oncology care is now the standard of care that is recommended for any patient with advanced cancer to begin within 8 weeks of diagnosis on the basis of evidence-driven national clinical practice guidelines; however, there are not enough interdisciplinary palliative care teams to provide such care. How and what can an oncology office incorporate into usual care, borrowing the tools used in PC randomized clinical trials (RCTs), to improve care for patients and their caregivers? We reviewed the multiple RCTs for common practical elements and identified methods and techniques that oncologists can use to deliver some parts of concurrent interdisciplinary PC. We recommend the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcomes, including the evaluation of symptoms with such tools as the Edmonton or Memorial Symptom Assessment Scales, spirituality with the FICA Spiritual History Tool or similar questions, and psychosocial distress with the Distress Thermometer. All patients should be assessed for how they prefer to receive information, their current understanding of their situation, and if they have considered some advance care planning. Approximately 1 hour of additional time with the patient is required each month. If the oncologist does not have established ties with spiritual care and social work, he or she should establish these relationships for counseling as required. Caregivers should be asked about coping and support needs. Oncologists can adapt PC techniques to achieve results that are similar to those in the RCTs of PC plus usual care compared with usual care alone. This is comparable to using data from RCTs of trastuzamab or placebo, adopting what was used in the RCTs without modification or dilution.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 13 Jun 2017 05:06 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2023 02:00 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63729 |
DOI: | 10.1200/JOP.2017.022939 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |