Patronising lawyers? Homophily and same-sex litigation teams before the UK Supreme Court

Hanretty, Chris and Vaughan, Steven (2017) Patronising lawyers? Homophily and same-sex litigation teams before the UK Supreme Court. Public Law, 3. pp. 426-449.

Preview

PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version Download (594kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate patterns of team formation amongst barristers who appeared before the UK Supreme Court between October 2009 and August 2015. We show that there is evidence of considerable gender homophily in the formation of teams of barristers appearing before the UK Supreme Court. Same-sex teams of barristers are over-represented compared to the number we would expect if barristers paired up randomly. We also show that this gender homophily remains when we allow for the possibility that barristers pair up randomly within their chambers, or within their area of law. As such, the formation of teams of barristers in the Supreme Court is governed by practices and preferences which make same-sex legal teams more likely than they would be if team formation simply involved a gender-blind draw from a pool of lawyers. Barristers appearing before the Supreme Court prefer, for whatever reason, to work with other barristers of the same sex. We set out reasons why homophily in team formation is undesirable and discuss the routes through which different remedies might operate.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
Depositing User:	Pure Connector
Date Deposited:	20 Dec 2016 00:08
Last Modified:	13 Oct 2022 18:33
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/61779
DOI:

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item