Tools
Tools
Bouzid, Maha, Brainard, Julii, Hooper, Lee 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7904-3331 and Hunter, Paul R ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5608-6144
(2016)
Public health interventions for Aedes control in the time of Zikavirus- A metareview on effectiveness of vector control strategies.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10 (12).
ISSN 1935-2727
Preview |
PDF (Bouzid Zika journal pntd 0005176)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: There is renewed interest in effective control measures to control Zika and dengue vectors. A synthesis of published systematic reviews with a focus on grading of intervention evidence is warranted to determine the reliability of evidence for control strategies. Methodology: We conducted a meta-review (a systematic review of systematic reviews) assessing the effectiveness of any Aedes control measure. We searched Scopus and Medline for relevant reviews through to 11 May 2016. Titles, abstracts and full texts were assessed independently for inclusion by two authors. Data extraction was performed independently in duplicate using a standardised form and validity of the evidence in each review was assessed using GRADE criteria. Findings: 13 eligible systematic reviews that investigated the effect of community interventions on entomological parameters (such as vector density) or disease incidence were included. Quality of evidence was mostly low to very low due to poor reporting of study design, observational methodologies, heterogeneity, and indirect outcomes, hindering an evidence-based recommendation. Biological controls seem to achieve better reduction of entomological indices than chemical controls, while educational campaigns can reduce breeding habitats and interrupt disease transmission cycle. Integrated control strategies may not add efficiency to educational campaigns. Conclusions: Despite decades of Aedes mosquito abatement programmes, mosquito populations are widely established and abundant, and associated with a significant disease burden. The efficiency of any control programme is dependent on local settings and resources. More good quality primary studies for the control of Aedes transmitted diseases are still required.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2016 Bouzid et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Epidemiology and Public Health Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Water Security Research Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023) Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health |
| Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2016 15:00 |
| Last Modified: | 09 May 2024 09:31 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/61351 |
| DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005176 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |