Wood, Caroline E., Hardeman, Wendy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-9407, Johnston, Marie, Francis, Jill, Abraham, Charles and Michie, Susan (2016) Reporting behaviour change interventions: do the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1, and training in its use, improve the quality of intervention descriptions? Implementation Science, 11. ISSN 1748-5908
Preview |
PDF (Manuscript)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (840kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Behaviour change interventions are likely to be reproducible only if reported clearly. We assessed whether the behaviour change technique taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1), with and without training in identifying BCTs, improves the clarity and replicability of written reports of observed behaviour change interventions. Methods: Three studies assessed effects of using and training in the use of BCTTv1 on the clarity and replicability of intervention descriptions written after observing videos of smoking cessation interventions. Study 1 examined the effects of using and not using BCTTv1. Study 2 examined the effects of using BCTTv1 and training in use of BCTTv1 compared no use and no training. Study 3 employed a within-group design to assess change in descriptions written before and after training. One-hundred and 66 ‘writers’ watched videos of behaviour change interventions and wrote descriptions of the active components delivered. In all studies, the participants’ written descriptions were evaluated by (i) 12 ‘raters’ (untrained in BCTTv1) for clarity and replicability and (ii) 12 ‘coders’ (trained in BCTTv1) for reliability of BCT coding. Writers rated the usability and accessibility of using BCTTv1 to write descriptions. Results: Ratings of clarity and replicability did not differ between groups in study 1 (all ps > 0.05), were poorer for trained users in study 2 (all ps < 0.01) and improved following training in study 3 (all ps < 0.05). BCT identification was more reliable from descriptions written by trained BCTTv1 users (p < 0.05; study 2) but not simple use of BCTTv1 (p = 0.93; study 1) or by writers who had written a description without BCTTv1, before training (p = 0.50; study 3). Writers reported that using BCTTv1 was difficult but ‘useful’, ‘good’ and ‘desirable’ and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable (all means above mid-point of the scale). Conclusions: Effects of training to use BCTTv1 on the quality of written reports of observed interventions were mixed, with some suggestion of improved clarity and replicability of reporting in the within- (study 3) but not the between-group studies (studies 1 and 2). Potential benefits of using BCTTv1 may have been limited by the artificial nature and time constraints of the task.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | behaviour change,reporting interventions,taxonomy |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2016 11:00 |
Last Modified: | 19 Oct 2023 01:43 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59319 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s13012-016-0448-9 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
View Item |