Kularatna, Sanjeewa, Whitty, Jennifer A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-1933, Johnson, Newell W. and Scuffham, Paul A. (2013) Health state valuation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature. Value in Health, 16 (6). pp. 1091-1099. ISSN 1098-3015
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Objective: Cost-utility analysis is widely used in high-income countries to inform decisions on efficient health care resource allocation. Cost-utility analysis uses the quality-adjusted life-year as the outcome measure of health. High-income countries have undertaken health state valuation (HSV) studies to determine country-specific utility weights to facilitate valuation of health-related quality of life. Despite an evident need, however, the extent of HSVs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is unclear. Methods: The literature was searched systematically by using four databases and additional Web searches to identify HSV studies carried out in LMICs. The Preferred Reporting System for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) strategy was followed to ensure systematic selection of the articles. Results: The review identified 17 HSV studies from LMICs. Twelve studies were undertaken in upper middle-income countries, while lower middle- and low-income countries contributed three and two studies, respectively. There were 7 generic HSV and 10 disease-specific HSV studies. The seven generic HSVs included five EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire, one six-dimensional health state short form (derived from short-form 36 health survey), and one Assessment of Quality of Life valuations. Time trade-off was the predominant valuation method used across all studies. Conclusions: This review found that health state valuations from LMICs are uncommon and utility weights are generally unavailable for these countries to carry out health economic evaluation. More HSV studies need to be undertaken in LMICs to facilitate efficient resource allocation in their respective health systems.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | health state valuation,lmic,preference,qaly,utility,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Economics Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Respiratory and Airways Group Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023) |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 27 Apr 2016 12:00 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2022 12:31 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/58422 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.006 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |