Fleming, Piers, Townsend, Ellen, Lowe, Kenneth and Ferguson, Eamonn (2007) Social desirability influences on judgements of biotechnology across the dimensions of risk, ethicality and naturalness. Journal of Risk Research, 10 (7). pp. 989-1003. ISSN 1366-9877
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
This study examined the relationship between social desirability and dimensional judgments of risk, naturalness and ethicality for biotechnological and matched natural health technologies. We examine if those who are motivated to respond in a socially‐desirable way will be more likely to rate genetically‐modified (GM) technologies as more risky (less natural or ethical) than those who are not motivated to respond in a socially‐desirable way. One‐hundred and forty‐eight participants rated eight technologies along three dimensions (risk, naturalness and ethicality) and completed a measure of social desirability. The results showed that ethicality was unrelated to social desirability. The dimension of naturalness was related to social desirability regardless of the type of technology. The results further showed that for GM technologies those motivated to respond in a socially desirable way rated these as more risky. Theoretical and methodological implications are drawn from the study.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Social Work and Psychology (former - to 2012) Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Psychology |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Cognition, Action and Perception Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Social Cognition Research Group |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2015 13:00 |
Last Modified: | 22 Apr 2023 01:16 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/54846 |
DOI: | 10.1080/13669870701486913 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |