Competing Interpretations: Human Wellbeing and the Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Development Policy and Practice

McGregor, J. Allister, Coulthard, Sarah and Camfield, Laura ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0165-9857 (2015) Competing Interpretations: Human Wellbeing and the Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Development Policy and Practice. In: Mixed methods research in poverty and vulnerability. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 9781137452504

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

The renewed focus on human wellbeing in international policy and academic debate encourages us to think again about how quantitative and qualitative methods are combined in understanding development and poverty. During the 2000s the Q-Squared movement provided a wide range of valuable and insightful material that explored the possibilities for and obstacles to combining qualitative and quantitative research methods (Kanbur and Schaffer eds. 2007). Since then a growing number of national and international statistical agencies have recognised the importance of seeking to assess the impacts of governance and public policy in terms of human wellbeing and in doing so they are adopting a hybrid framework that takes account of the objective and subjective dimensions of human wellbeing (UK ONS 2011; OECD 2011). This chapter presents the argument that if development policy and practice is to promote a focus on human wellbeing then it is necessary to consider what types of data are required to do that. The current ‘business as usual’ in international development focuses mainly on material wellbeing and tentatively and occasionally stretches out to encompass human development outcomes (Alkire and Foster 2011). This chapter argues that in order to assess a more holistic conception of human wellbeing (McGregor and Sumner 2010) then it is necessary to generate three types of data: objective, subjective and inter-subjective . In order to achieve this both quantitative and qualitative methods are required and it is necessary to reconsider how these are sequenced and mixed to generate that.

Item Type:	Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords:	wellbeing
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development)
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Gender and Development Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Impact Evaluation Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Life Course, Migration and Wellbeing University of East Anglia Schools > Faculty of Science > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
Depositing User:	Pure Connector
Date Deposited:	16 Feb 2015 14:00
Last Modified:	20 Oct 2023 01:29
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/52091
DOI:

Actions (login required)

View Item