Hanretty, Chris (2015) Judicial disagreement need not be political: dissent on the Estonian Supreme Court. Europe-Asia Studies, 67 (6). pp. 970-988. ISSN 0966-8136
Preview |
PDF (europe_asia_full)
- Accepted Version
Download (141kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I investigate the non-unanimous decisions of judges on the Estonian Supreme Court. I argue that since judges on the court enjoy high de jure independence, dissent frequently, and are integrated in the normal judicial hierarchy, the Estonian Supreme Court is a crucial case for the presumption that judicial disagreement reveals policy preferences. I analyse dissenting opinions using an ideal point response model. Examining the characteristics of cases which discriminated with respect to the recovered dimension, I show that this dimension cannot be interpreted as a meaningful policy dimension, but instead reflects disagreement about the proper scope of constitutional redress.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 19 Dec 2014 14:02 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2022 00:11 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/51590 |
DOI: | 10.1080/09668136.2015.1054260 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |